Author Topic: Ferguson  (Read 9045 times)

MIO

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 131
    • View Profile
Ferguson
« on: August 13, 2015, 06:13:39 PM »
I saw this posted on the blog page. I don't FB so here we go:

newbielink:http://[url=http://www.uslawshield.com/armed-civilians-patrol-ferguson/]http://www.uslawshield.com/armed-civili ... -ferguson/ [nonactive]
[/url]

I've posted this statement here before. The first question isn't "is this legal?" But "is this smart?"

Having said that where was this blog when they the ferguson folks had the black panthers come in last year and do exactly the same thing? It's not these guys fault the panthers used rifles but no plate carriers.
Also the panthers among others don't live there but the guy in the beard does in the next town over. In fact he runs a business in the next turn over. Feel free to PM for his name, website and business.
He has a vested interest unlike other imported trouble makers to include a trouble making group from my home in Oklahoma that carpooled to ferguson last year.
Does this mean I agree with him and his actions. No not really but I do understand his frustration and respect his decision. I also noticed that trouble makers didn't shoot at them like they did officers the previous night.  

My question to the TLS is "would you defend him?" He was legal.

I'm not a huge fan of "oath keepers" but I do think you have a right to defend against bullies, mobs and criminals
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest »

MIO

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 131
    • View Profile
Re: Ferguson
« Reply #1 on: August 18, 2015, 04:30:14 PM »
Ruh roo raggy
newbielink:http://[url=http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/08/oath-keepers-to-hold-march-through-ferguson-with-50-armed-black-protesters/]http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/08 ... rotesters/ [nonactive]
[/url]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest »