Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Neighbor

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 15
1
Halftime, your statement on a public forum that you intend to disobey 30.06 signs probably won't make your defense any easier!

2
If my information is correct, although SB1942 did not pass, I understand the language from that same bill was added to SB1566 (page 11) at the last minute by Hefner and that bill did pass and was signed by the govenor. Please correct me if this is not the case.

3
Ask the Lawyers / Re: Texas CHL/Gun License renewal procedure.
« on: June 29, 2017, 08:59:05 PM »
If your license expires the end of October, I'm surprised you haven't already received a letter from DPS licensing explaining how to renew.
Mine was to expire the end of Sept. and I received a letter in April. I did the on-line part the application and paid my fee on May 3rd and on May 15th my new license arrived in the mailbox - I was pleasantly surprised. I even have the old ink fingerprints on file and they indicated at the end of my online portion that my information on file would be "reviewed" to see if it met current standards so I figured I would have to redo something but not the case.

4
General Firearms Law Discussion / Re: NJ castle doctrine
« on: June 23, 2017, 05:22:04 PM »
Good thing I don't live in NJ because I'm pretty sure I retreating out my own back door wouldn't be my #1 solution to someone breaking in my front door - unless it was to step outside and get more firepower and come back in ;D

5
Lawyer reply to same question:


TexasLawShield
Administrator
Newbie
*****
Posts: 880
View Profile  Email

Re: SB 1942 Relating to the transportation or storage of a handgun..school lot
« Reply #7 on: Today at 04:22:13 PM »
Quote
Berumen96,

This is correct. When this law goes into effect on September 1, your employer will not be able to terminate you for keeping your firearm concealed and secured in your vehicle for so long as you have a valid LTC.

6
Ask the Lawyers / Re: Carrying in Church
« on: June 12, 2017, 05:15:51 PM »
Maybe get him to consider removing the 30.06 sign anyway. Is he that antigun or bowing to pressure?

7
General Firearms Law Discussion / Re: NJ castle doctrine
« on: June 12, 2017, 05:11:14 PM »
Can't say as I'm surprised that New Jersery politicians/lawmakers have some strange ideas compared to what I consider the average American.  :)

When you say "cornered" I assume you mean you have to retreat if at all possible? Does this mean that if you can slip out the back door of your own house when a "bad guy" comes in the front door with a gun, you must do that  rather than shoot back??

8
General Firearms Law Discussion / Re: NJ castle doctrine
« on: June 10, 2017, 10:48:43 PM »
Don't guess I know what the NJ castle doctrine says??

9
Ask the Lawyers / Re: Volunteer EMS w/LTC can carry in hospitals???
« on: June 07, 2017, 09:23:08 PM »
Is this limited to volunteer only, or does it include paid first responders also?

10
I believe this new law is response to many schools putting rules in place stating that employees could not have firearms in their vehicles. Of course this does not make it against the law, but they could be fired if the firearm was discovered.

11
In The News / Re: Attack on Pets by Wildlife
« on: May 22, 2017, 06:18:31 PM »
Found this in the "Ask the Lawyers" section



TexasLawShield
Administrator
Newbie
*****
Posts: 858
View Profile  Email

Re: Coverage if I shoot a dog
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2014, 09:58:05 AM »
Quote
drdriller,

There is no general right to use force or deadly force against a dog that is attacking a human. The Texas Health & Safety Code has authorized the killing of a dog or coyote if it is attacking a domestic animal, livestock or fowl, but not a human. There is a self-defense provision contained in the cruelty to animal’s crime, but it only applies to attacks from "dangerous wild animals", however, dogs are not in this category. A person who is charged with a crime resulting from defending themselves or another, would have to rely on the defense of necessity, showing that to not commit a crime would actually result in a worse consequence. Such as, to not shoot an attacking dog would result in a mauled child. Keep in mind that if a person does use a firearm to kill a dog, that they could not only be charged with cruelty to animals, but also any of the gun crimes, i.e. display by a concealed license holder, disorderly conduct, deadly conduct, discharge in a municipality, or discharge in violation of municipal ordinance. Related to your specific circumstance, it would most likely be a question which would have to be decided by a judge or jury. TLS reviews each case on a case-by-case basis. In the situation you provided, barring other circumstances, this would be covered by TLS.

12
According to a news article I pulled up, the police spokesman said the Alcohol Beverage Commision listed the club as a Blue sign meaning it was not a 51% business. He did comment that there was some confusion because there was actually both a red and blue sign posted but said he felt like the red sign was in error.

Surely no DA is going to try and make something out of this!

13
Ask the Lawyers / Re: NY state laws
« on: May 04, 2017, 07:21:13 PM »
Might be a bit further, He Crow, but would be a lot less hassle to get hunting property in Texas  :)

15
In The News / Re: Academy's Take on Tatical Weapons
« on: March 10, 2017, 04:57:44 PM »
Just screamed??? Was there any explanation?

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 15